A public response to those listed below in view of their surprising mention in my divorce proceedings:
United States Secret Service
Benjamin Bernanke, Chairman of the Federal Reserve
Barack Hussein Obama, President of the United States of America
Case # 86316-FL, Family Law, Domestic Violence, May 20, 2010
Presiding judge: Ronald J. Rubin
Location: Montgomery County Circuit Court, Rockville, Maryland 20850 (case materials are available from the court to the legal profession and the Press)
Plaintiff under coercion of US Government, Pro Se (Representing herself):
Dr Natalia Tabatchnaia Tamirisa, Economist and Assistant to the Director of Research Department, Olivier Blanchard, Grade Level A-15 (As of May 20, 2010), International Monetary Fund (IMF), Washington, D.C
Accusation: Defendant Chandrashekar Tamirisa’s geneology has a history of mental health issues, and, therefore:
(A) That he is a potential danger to his spouse – the Plaintiff, despite there being no history of domestic violence by him on her, her mother Yelena Tabachnaya, and children – daughter Francesca Tamirisa, 9, and son Richard Tamirisa, 6, because he shoved his mother-in-law Yelena Tabachnaya and the son was afraid and crying after that and because of it, hiding under a table, on an unverifiable date recorded by Plaintiff in her notebook when the marriage was normal, unusual because -
(B) His conduct at the Federal Reserve because he, the Defendant Chandrashekar (Chandra) Tamirisa, on Thursday April 22, 2010 sent the email below to senior officials, in particular, Kevin M. Warsh, Administrative Governor and Member of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System after his my performance reviews of 2009-2010 which attempted to negate the Defendant Chandrashekar (Chandra) Tamirisa’s communications skills despite having been highly acknowledged by the Federal Reserve on March 20, 2003 toward the institution’s strategic planning -
(C) Secret Service called the Plaintiff Dr Natalia Tabatchnaia-Tamirisa (a.k.a Dr Natalia Tabatchnaia Tamirisa a.k.a Dr Natalia Tamirisa) per the voice and paper transcripts of this case, as acknowledged by the Plaintiff.
Defendant (absent in court, unaware and not notified of the Plaintiff’s charges and, therefore, without defense):
Me, Chandrashekar (Chandra) Tamirisa -
(1) A full time civil service employee of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System in Washington, D.C at Grade Level FR-25 from May 1998 to January 2001, and from June 2001 until my resignation under pressure which had become effective on 06/16/2010, with no charges by the Fed against me and a full Class II FOMC security clearance for sensitive data until the day my resignation had become effective, including for remote access from my marital home where I used my government-provided laptop with a security token returned to the Fed later upon my instructions as to its location by my now former spouse, the Plaintiff.
Having been twice denied transfer to the Fed’s Communications group headed by Ms. Michelle Smith, in April 2010 I had twice turned down a settlement of $50,000 in preference to continue in my job at the Fed as a Research Systems Analyst in the Fiscal Analysis Section of the Division of Research and Statistics because I was fully protected – for my public utterances, which I had not shared explicitly with the Federal Reserve at any time during my career except for one article as a contribution toward a Department of Interior’s intergovernmental Federal effort for energy efficiency in government, made in writing by me as fully written and edited articles for the major national news papers, Pickens Plan, Obama for America as advise to the president, and on my online blog beginning in December 2009 – by:
- Civil Service protections of the United States government
- No Fear Act
- Whistle Blower protections, and
- United States Constitution
(2) Maryland Pickens Plan District Leader (unpaid volunteer), District 8 (Representative Chris Van Hollen, Democrat, Maryland) from October 2008 to April 2011 and State Leader (unpaid volunteer) from June 2009 to April 2011 when I voluntarily resigned on amicable terms to fully focus on my paying business activities.
(3) Independent Global Sustainability Consultant, Entrepreneur and Government Relations professional at www.futurespace.me, on Linkedin, and as Applied Economist (MA in Applied Economics, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, Graduation date: Spring 2008).
Summary judgment by Judges Ronald Rubin and Louise Scrivener:
I, the Defendant Chandrashekar Tamirisa, was handcuffed without arrest by 4 police officers in 2 Montgomery County vehicles with no advanced notice and not knowing where I was being taken after I was asked if I “had any problem with President Obama” by the police, when alone at home at 504 Watkins Pond Blvd., Rockville, MD 20850 on 05/20/2010 around 6:00 P.M – after I had sent 2 emails from my iPhone 240-506-9053 (988-575-9902 in India since late November 2012) – one to Montgomery County Gazette Letters to the Editor (later published in the paper on 05/25/2010) about the county’s energy tax incentive policies and another to a Global Zero youth group supporting their efforts on nuclear disarmament – the rest of the family prepared and notified by the court to leave residence when the police arrive, for my admission into the emergency ward and later for regular in-patient admission in the Seneca Unit at around 3 AM on 05/21/2010 (notice the time on my email of 02/01/2003, indicating a psychopathology in US government, Christ Syndrome as I coin the malady, a possible reason for my guinea-pigging, a federal crime) to the Federal Reserve via my secure Federal Reserve laptop, upon its solicitation of all employees, individually), after examination by 2 clinical psychologists of Shady Grove Adventist Behavioral Health Facility, on 05/20/2010.
I was not permitted by the police to keep my above numbered iPhone, house keys, clothes, money, wallet, and other belongings except the clothes and the casual home footwear I was in at the time of arrival of the county police, with no where to go upon discharge besides being required of the health facility to call police for me to be picked up by them to help me after leaving the hospital. The police had not asked me of any other family/friend contacts nor did the hospital. Against my will I was subject to Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), urine and blood tests repeatedly.
The police while driving me to the destination unknown to me, after I showed them on their laptop my online writings as a public policy and strategy consultant who critiqued the administration’s policies for a job besides my government employment, did not think I needed to stay at Shady Grove Adventist Behavioral Health Center for more than 2 hours and that I should be released on the same day. My handcuffs were removed upon arrival at the Shady Grove Adventist Behavioral Health Center and I was handed off cordially to the emergency room staff.
Optional medication, Risperidone as a prophylatic, unbeknownst to me, wasprescribed by Dr Samina Yousufi, psychiatrist-on-call on all days of the defendant’s involuntary admittance, asked by a Mr Brad Herzeg, a county public defender I sought while in the facility on Day 2 of my stay, to convert to voluntary which I promptly refused seeking discharge beginning the morning after I entered it on 05/21/2010 after first informing the Fed, my employer, why I was unable to come to work.
My hospital stay was at a cost to the defendant, me, despite being healthy, from 05/20-05/24, 4 days being an unusual length of time for healthy patients with no signs of mental illness. Medication, after discharge, was recommended by Attorney Alan Solomon of Bethesda, Maryland for the purpose of medical and legal compliance, albeit no disease, for a period of a month without the need for refills, for the purpose of court appearances. The hospital staff were themselves in dismay as to why I was kept there for 4 days as an in-patient.
Psychiatrist’s opinion (Final, July 08, 2010 by Dr Peter Blaes, Town Center Psychiatrists, Rockville, Maryland):
No mental/psychiatric illness contrary to the suspicions of Judge Ronald Rubin on 05/20/2010 (later I had also persuaded Dr Lee Haller in Potomac, Maryland, an experienced forensic psychiatrist whose patient I was not but whose expert testimony I was seeking should there be a trial in my divorce case, that I was, for sound reasons, well within my rights to pursue a criminal complaint with the FBI against Bernanke and Obama. Dr Haller had spoken to the Fed about me upon my consent for him to do so).
I had not discussed my work-related stresses in detail with my spouse, the Plaintiff, because of her usual dismissiveness and reluctance to hear for fear of repercussions to her outstanding career at the IMF and in the economics profession as a researcher given my tendency as an Applied Economist to be controversial and outside the box of group think, especially after her mistreatment by the IMF when I publicly opined in an Op-Ed submission to a major national newspaper on the Iceland crisis; commented on a paper by an IMF economist, her colleague Antonio Spilimbergo, called Education and Terrorism written for a National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) conference in Boston, upon his and her request and informed that I have done so to an economist at the Fed, a former graduate student named Byron Lutz at Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) of her IMF supervisor Olivier Blanchard attending the same conference; and engaged both as a lobbyist and as an expert on climate change through the Pickens Plan, critiquing the high profile team’s work which she led at the IMF; disputed the concurrence of IMF Research with Edmund Phelps’ public case for recapitalization; disagreed with her on the ability of the IMF to be able to successfully devise early warning systems because of political constraints in international economics. I was correct on all five.
The above linked paper of mine on Financial Regulatory Reform was turned down for publication by Finance and Economics Discussion Series, FEDS, of the Fed but was highly regarded for originalism produced by a yet-to-be-published economist as a prospective Nobel-winning idea though not accepted for publication by the American Economic Association, AEA. This single authored paper is currently, in 2012, in vogue as one solution to further reform Dodd-Frank just as I had contended in 2009-2010.
Likewise, my commentary on the Affordable Care Act, ACA, was turned down for publication by FEDS, AEA and the Journal of the American Medical Association, JAMA, despite having been complimented by the medical profession for its originality. ACA, as I had seminally argued in 2009-2010 in the public domain having coined the word “Obamacare”, is once again up for further reform. As a result, the Democrats and the president have lost control of the House of Representatives and seats in the United States Senate in 2010.
President Obama’s legacy – domestic and foreign – despite his Nobel Peace Prize in 2009 which I also legitimately critiqued in the public domain – is at stake.
In the period 2011-2012 my business cards, my computer backup cable, and my iPad I used to present my corporations to the Mayor of Rockville, Ms Marcuccio, and to business associates, were stolen from my apartment in Rockville, Maryland where I no longer live after 06/29/2012 because my lease had ended. I have an open police complaint about the theft with notification to Mayor Marcuccio whom I know in person.
In summary, by 2012, 2 years after 06/16/2010, my effective date of end of Federal Reserve employment, despite my forced marital separation, divorce and continuing government misconduct against me in gross violation of my human rights and civil liberties, I have publicly proven conclusively on both domestic US and US foreign policy matters abroad and at home in the United States – where I have been a naturalized citizen since September 24, 2002 but rumored to be otherwise for the purposes of Anthros by the Federal Reserve until I pointed out the erroneous information in the government database to Federal Reserve security in 2009 – that Bernanke and Obama are wrong and I, Chandrashekar (Chandra) Tamirisa, am correct.
Responses to my SF-95 filings against White House and Federal Reserve, in the appropriate Federal jurisdiction upon the recommendation of Maryland Judicial Disabilities Commission and State of Maryland Attorney General, for a settlement of $18.5 million in civil damages for:
(A) Violation of my civil liberties in the view of Judge Ronald Rubin.
(B) Chronic public harassment, violation of my privacy in violation of Amendment 4 of the Constitution and by including my family and friends by Anthros – a government behavioral control program because, though a non-economist at the Fed, “you can figure things out” in the words of Ms Janice Shack-Marquez, Administrative and Ethics Officer of the Fed’s Divison of Research and Statistics. Policy disagreements in the public domain are not unethical nor is whistle blowing under US Constitution and Law.
(C) Veiled death threat to me and my family in December 2010, after separation and during divorce proceedings from the Plaintiff, from the pension plan of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System for which Senator Barbara Mikulski of Maryland received no satisfactory answers from the Fed.
(D) For other reasons listed below: