Great to see this blog being updated again……

Endogenizing technical change can, to a large extent, minimize fluctuations around the mean growth level.

The how of achieving it this outcome is a matter of monetary policy vis-a-vis endogenization of technical change.

Transformations ‏ @c_tamirisa
@NorahODonnell That so many demonstrated lack of judgment at the same time is interesting.

Norah O’Donnell ‏ @NorahODonnell
USSS Breakdown: 1 retired, 1 proposed for removal, 6 resigned, 3 cleared of wrongdoing, 1 moving for security clearance revocation

1. Jay Carney, The White House Press Secretary, has reported after an internal investigation that no WH staff member is involved .

2. The female Secret Service colored agent who walked by the George W. Bush limousine has blown the Cartagena whistle on the male Secret Service agents and the military personnel who are now 12 in number to Secretary Panetta’s embarrassment.

The implications of this are interesting to say the least –

(A) The black female agent, possibly of Republican leaning and associated with Dr. Condoleeza Rice, former Secretary of State, may have supported Obama in 2008 and so could have the Skull and Bones Republicans, at Dr. Rice’s behest to get Obama elected the first black president of the United States.

(B) Racism in The White House, both among the Democrats and among the Executive Branch agencies, including Secret Service, its parent agency Department of Homeland Security (DHS), and the Pentagon, could be sabotaging the presidency from the inside.

(C) The agent could have blown the whistle to protect any danger to the reputation and the life of the president.

(D) It is as yet unknown if the dangers persist within the government or if the president himself has been implicated by Secret Societies such as Bohemian Club and Bilderberg.

Internal investigation anywhere in government, especially for misconduct of this magnitude, is not sufficient accountability given my ongoing experience with the Federal Reserve (Case # 86316-FL Montgomery County Circuit Court, MD) with unambiguously brazen connections to both Bohemian Club and Bilderberg.

The Attorney General of the United States must appoint a special prosecutor.

1. Iran’s cooperation to return to P5 + 1 talks may be moot if Iran, under IAEA transparency, is capable of Uranium enrichment on its own.

P5+1 must transfer the responsibility of engaging the Iranian nuclear program to IAEA after the next round of talks with Iran provided all nuclear programs in the world, including P5+1, are open to IAEA.

Biological vocalization evolved with the FOXP2 gene beginning about 100,000 to 70,000 years ago.

Elementary observation informs that the quality of written language is always better than the quality of spoken language. People do not speak as they write. Writing gives structure to language which, when vocalized, adapts that structure to speech, thinking being common to both written and spoken language.

1. All diplomatic options are not exhausted.

2. Iran can legally, under international law (International Atomic Energy Agency or IAEA), develop nuclear technology indigenously.

3. Regional safety issues arising from the Iranian nuclear program are regional: Arab League, Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) regional members and then for the United Nations Security Council (UNSC).

4. Regional security issues arising from the Iranian nuclear program are regional: Arab League, OPEC regional members and then for the UNSC.

5. Iran cannot be attacked under US law unless US property is physically attacked anywhere in the world, including cyberspace.

6. United States may already be attacking Iran in cyberspace, justifying Iranian defense from within US and EU or other Iranian implicit or explicit external allies.

7. Any action by the president of the United States in contravention of US Constitution and established government procedures for handling US weapons of mass destruction, such as the knowledge of US nuclear codes, can lead to his impeachment and/or charging outside actors, such as Bohemian Club, with domestic espionage and sedition.

“Mayflower Compact

In the name of God, Amen. We, whose names are underwritten, the loyal subjects of our dread Sovereign Lord King James, by the Grace of God, of Great Britain, France, and Ireland, King, defender of the Faith, etc.

In witness whereof we have hereunto subscribed our names at Cape Cod the 11th of November, in the year of the reign of our Sovereign Lord King James, of England, France, and Ireland, the eighteenth, and of Scotland the fifty-fourth, 1620.“

Today’s mechanism of political control by pre-democratic monarchies of Europe as a result:

A. Old money (Kings, Queens and Royal Families of Europe).

B. Prestige from old money for government workers (Secret Societies).

C. Government (including elected officials) responds by favoring the financial markets and business interests of old money through the Federal Reserve and central banks.

D. Old money is always in control of politics, economics and society.

Today’s mechanism of political control by pre-democratic monarchies of Europe as a result:

A. Old money (Kings, Queens and Royal Families of Europe).

B. Prestige from old money for government workers (Secret Societies).

C. Government (including elected officials) responds by favoring the financial markets and business interests of old money through the Federal Reserve and central banks.

D. Old money is always in control of politics, economics and society.

▪ John Warner
▪ James D. Watson
▪ Simon Wiesenthal
▪ Alexander Vandegrift
▪ Walter Bedell Smith
▪ Steven Spielberg
▪ George E. Stratemeyer
▪ Mortimer Sackler
▪ Raymond Sackler
▪ Brent Scowcroft
▪ Arthur Rubinstein
▪ Dean Rusk
▪ Murray Perahia
▪ William Perry
▪ Charles Poletti
▪ André Previn
▪ Byron Price
▪ George S. Patton
▪ Eugene Ormandy
▪ T. Michael Moseley
▪ Lewis Mumford
▪ Edward R. Murrow
▪ T. Michael Moseley
▪ Lewis Mumford
▪ Edward R. Murrow
▪ Paul Mellon
▪ Ted Kennedy
▪ George Kenney
▪ Henry Kissinger
▪ J. Edgar Hoover
▪ Bob Hope
▪ Frederick J. Horne
▪ Billy Graham
▪ Cecil Howard Green
▪ Alan Greenspan
▪ Bill Gates
▪ Louis V. Gerstner, Jr.
▪ Barney M. Giles
▪ Rudy Giuliani
▪ Arthur Lehman Goodhart
▪ Douglas Fairbanks, Jr.
▪ Tommy Franks
▪ Ira C. Eaker
▪ William J. Donovan
▪ Mark W. Clark
▪ Wesley Clark
▪ Edward L. Cochrane
▪ Alistair Cooke
▪ Donald Berwick
▪ Frank Bowman
▪ Walter Annenberg
▪ Frank Aydelotte

1. The Pill

2. The Morning After Pill

Required measures for health:

1. Breast feeding (Class: Mammalia)

2. Vaccines (Michael Kremer on Vaccines, Chandrashekar Tamirisa on sustainability and economic forecast of the United States in 2003)

3. Sanitation

Notable previous but disparate attempts were made by Robert Lucas (On the Mechanics of Economic Development, Monetary Neutrality), Amartya Sen (Nobel Lecture, particularly famine and food distribution in Bangladesh), Robert Solow (A Contribution to the Theory of Economic Growth), George Akerlof (Market for Lemons, Nobel Lecture) and George Stigler (Economics of Regulation).

The lynchpin, however, remains Robert Solow’s contribution, which I both integrate with other contributions mentioned above and overcome using a regulatory approach.

Most importantly, the indispensable complement of economics is politics. Institutional political economy is integrated into my sustainability framework in The State, predicated on American constitutionalism.

The zero growth initiative is three fold (keyword is “global”):

A. People migrate around the world to even population densities.

B. Zero global population growth rate (at the moment it is 1.096% for the world, US approx. 0.832 )

C. Zero global growth rate, by keeping total world stock of money supply at a constant level as in a monetary authority cartel, hence some variance from zero GDP growth rate of countries until there can be one world currency and one state.

Technical change happens within these constraints.

The 94% (China, India, South America, Central America and Africa, Civil War confederacy in the United States from East to West) are >> 6% (EU, European Russia, Yankees in the United States, Canada, Australia). So, “global” means the 94% outside the West.

West defined as Russia, Australia, Canada, United States, and EU, the most resource rich countries.

The 94% who need innovation can use their own currencies to do so.

Dr. Tabatchnaia-Tamirisa’s dissertation is preceded by:

(a) short prior working paper in 1996 by Chandrashekar Tamirisa in American Studies (for Johan Galtung et al) at University of Hawai’i at Manoa for the geopolitics of the causes and strategies of economic convergence (currently ideas from this paper form the crux of US-China Strategic Economic Dialog)

(b) A lengthy essay written by Chandrashekar Tamirisa for the Department of Political Science in University of Hawai’i from 1992-1996 titled “Did We Understand Modernity, Yet?” which lays the political-philosophical basis (Professors James Dator, Manfred Henningsen and Johan Galtung) for a paradigm shift in geopolitics from nuclear competition to non-dual use Global Zero predicated only on international economic competition and energy diversification.

(c) a short working paper, written by Chandrashekar Tamirisa for a graduate class in International Relations (of Professor Richard Chadwick) on the specific idea of the paradigm shift itself.

(b) and (c) became a part of Clinton administration’s international economic policy.

Notable previous but disparate attempts were made by Robert Lucas (On the Mechanics of Economic Development, Monetary Neutrality), Amartya Sen (Nobel Lecture, particularly famine and food distribution in Bangladesh), Robert Solow (A Contribution to the Theory of Economic Growth), George Akerlof (Market for Lemons, Nobel Lecture) and George Stigler (Economics of Regulation).

The lynchpin, however, remains Robert Solow’s contribution, which I both integrate with other contributions mentioned above and overcome using a regulatory approach.

Most importantly, the indispensable complement of economics is politics. Institutional political economy is integrated into my sustainability framework in The State, predicated on American constitutionalism.

The zero growth initiative is three fold (keyword is “global”):

A. People migrate around the world to even population densities.

B. Zero global population growth rate (at the moment it is 1.096% for the world, US approx. 0.832 )

C. Zero global growth rate, by keeping total world stock of money supply at a constant level as in a monetary authority cartel, hence some variance from zero GDP growth rate of countries until there can be one world currency and one state.

Technical change happens within these constraints.

The 94% (China, India, South America, Central America and Africa, Civil War confederacy in the United States from East to West) are >> 6% (EU, European Russia, Yankees in the United States, Canada, Australia). So, “global” means the 94% outside the West.

West defined as Russia, Australia, Canada, United States, and EU, the most resource rich countries.

The 94% who need innovation can use their own currencies to do so.

In the run up to November 06, 2012

The fora for the details to be structured are Rio+20 in June, World Bank (private capital flows), IMF (yet to enter the discussion) and IFC (private capital markets funding of sustainability) on the government side, various national capitals, and private NGO and corporate stakeholders to bring money into the development initiatives while shaping the framework and details to transform global markets to focus on development. I expect a 80-20 split between the markets and governments.

http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/toGPObss/http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/PLAW-112publ93/pdf/PLAW-112publ93.pdf

http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c112:H.R.3801:

What is $100B in shareholder capitalization of what is currently worth $3.5B in annual revenues, $1B in net income and about $2 for each of the 2.35B shares on average going to buy the US economy? What products? What services? How many jobs toward these purposes?

It may be that Facebook’s perceived value is $100B for 2.35B shares currently being privately held and no new shares to be issued or $40 per share. That perception in numbers is a P/E of 93 for Goldman Sachs and those who support Zuckerberg.

That stock is not widely available except at at least $40, returning 20 times current investment for its shareholders without any extra features on Facebook.

Now let us assume, the stock is more widely available, realizing the P/E, based on the perception the marketing of Facebook and Zuckerberg creates, the price will be raised to $400, creating a wealth effect. People may buy other things and increase US consumption as Clinton did in the ’90s, thereby growing the US economy at the same rate of growth as predicted.

For the above scenario to become practical, on average every tax paying American household must buy 16,000 shares of Facebook assuming that all of it is held by the public.

If the SEC S-1 is reviewed, about 40% of FB can be held by the public once Zuckerberg’s private investors are paid off. At some point, we do not know when yet, about 6000 shares could be held by each of the 145M tax paying American households or abroad. What is the growth path for the US economy based on these numbers? More importantly, averages do not work here. If 14.5M tax paying US households can get their hands on FB shares, Americans would be lucky.

YHWH to Moses in response to “What is your name?”: I am that I am (Asher Ehyeh Asher: Is it “I am YHWH I am”? Did God reveal his name to Moses or is it Hebrew for God?)

Krishna to Arjuna: Who is “I am that I am?” “Who are you?” I am it. The cosmos is divine. The Truth is Nirguna Brahmana (all are equal and devoid of characters and qualities, both good and bad, hence inherently divine).

See my article Jewish Diaspora above. Once bitten twice shy (once persecuted always persecuted) syndrome (Yehuda Bauer, A History of the Holocaust), besides Adam and Eve syndrome (Ham, Shem and Japeth: we are all children of the primordial parents, therefore, miscegenation is normal to the human race) as I describe in the article.

North European projection of power (European and Jewish, Theodr Herzl and the road to Balfour Declaration, 1917) must soften for permanent peace in Israel.

The Christians suffer from the theologically backward looking Jesus syndrome: crucifixion as proof of passionate commitment to a cause (see comment above for The Revelation to John and the Second Coming).

At issue before crucifixion was: let us let in the Rabbi from Galili (Nazareth) into the temple elite if he relents on his claim to be the son of god.They did not mind his claim as the descendant of David and Solomon or his aspiration to be the King of the Jews because they had kings before without whom there would be no temple (Jesus of Nazareth; Nostra Aetate, Vatican POPE PAUL VI ON OCTOBER 28, 1965, Sister Rose’s Passion). He refused. He claimed to be the deliverer sent by his Father threatening the faith whose practice was autonomous in Judea but under Roman control. He was crucified. Most likely he was born to Mary of parthenogenesis and was not immortal

The Jews proved their point that he was human and not divine.

Ecce Homo, http://ctamirisa.com/2010/12/26/ecce-homo-a-critique-of-jesus/

Love thy neighbor as thyself (Leviticus, a book of Moses. An acquaintance of mine told me once that this wisdom is attributed to Hillel, I think it is Socratic, it could even be Egyptian from many centuries earlier and appears again in the Christian gospels much later).


http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Golden_Rule

Love of thy neighbor, of all human beings, needs resources. Love alone will not solve the problem. Action does. Or hate will become pervasive. Jesus was a preacher and did his job. He acted. However, is volunteering to be crucified action out of love or is it masochistic moral suasion? He did not have to die had he loved himself.


The Sermon on the Mount is an extraordinary critique of Judaism. Had he relented he would have been admitted into the temple priesthood, reformed Judaism to accept the Roman Gentiles (foreskinned males, perhaps circumcising a male sheep instead of infants) and made peace with Europe. The Romans liked him. They co-existed with the Jews but did not like the elitism of the ancient faith. It was in mutual interest to reform Jewish attitudes to Rome.



With due respect to all the adherents of the faith, he was a schnuck (naive) to die as he did. His Father in Heaven is going to teach him something about the real world and send him back to fix it, this time in control of his own life.

Most importantly, is the history of Christianity action as love? Does Christian love kill non-Christians and each other? If it does Jesus is not Christian. Or Christians are not Christians and Jesus is the only Christian. “There was only one Christian. He died on the cross.”

Christian conservatism can only be proven in complete nuclear disarmament. Can America do it?

http://www.anti-semitism.net/tag/chandra-tamirisa

The Jewish exile, as I stated above, must end in earth (pagan) – the eden – and in one world (one God, many individual paths), not in overwriting all of civilization with Jewish cosmology. Creation and evolution are not mutually inconsistent. And dominion is not domination. Not man and nature, but man is nature.

I can give you one God, but not the Aryan enlightenment – nobility of birth to nobility of the mind, no matter what your birth.

Work for a sustainable Israel at peace with its neighbors. I will work with you.