In the run up to November 06, 2012

The fora for the details to be structured are Rio+20 in June, World Bank (private capital flows), IMF (yet to enter the discussion) and IFC (private capital markets funding of sustainability) on the government side, various national capitals, and private NGO and corporate stakeholders to bring money into the development initiatives while shaping the framework and details to transform global markets to focus on development. I expect a 80-20 split between the markets and governments.

http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/toGPObss/http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/PLAW-112publ93/pdf/PLAW-112publ93.pdf

http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c112:H.R.3801:

What is $100B in shareholder capitalization of what is currently worth $3.5B in annual revenues, $1B in net income and about $2 for each of the 2.35B shares on average going to buy the US economy? What products? What services? How many jobs toward these purposes?

It may be that Facebook’s perceived value is $100B for 2.35B shares currently being privately held and no new shares to be issued or $40 per share. That perception in numbers is a P/E of 93 for Goldman Sachs and those who support Zuckerberg.

That stock is not widely available except at at least $40, returning 20 times current investment for its shareholders without any extra features on Facebook.

Now let us assume, the stock is more widely available, realizing the P/E, based on the perception the marketing of Facebook and Zuckerberg creates, the price will be raised to $400, creating a wealth effect. People may buy other things and increase US consumption as Clinton did in the ’90s, thereby growing the US economy at the same rate of growth as predicted.

For the above scenario to become practical, on average every tax paying American household must buy 16,000 shares of Facebook assuming that all of it is held by the public.

If the SEC S-1 is reviewed, about 40% of FB can be held by the public once Zuckerberg’s private investors are paid off. At some point, we do not know when yet, about 6000 shares could be held by each of the 145M tax paying American households or abroad. What is the growth path for the US economy based on these numbers? More importantly, averages do not work here. If 14.5M tax paying US households can get their hands on FB shares, Americans would be lucky.

YHWH to Moses in response to “What is your name?”: I am that I am (Asher Ehyeh Asher: Is it “I am YHWH I am”? Did God reveal his name to Moses or is it Hebrew for God?)

Krishna to Arjuna: Who is “I am that I am?” “Who are you?” I am it. The cosmos is divine. The Truth is Nirguna Brahmana (all are equal and devoid of characters and qualities, both good and bad, hence inherently divine).

See my article Jewish Diaspora above. Once bitten twice shy (once persecuted always persecuted) syndrome (Yehuda Bauer, A History of the Holocaust), besides Adam and Eve syndrome (Ham, Shem and Japeth: we are all children of the primordial parents, therefore, miscegenation is normal to the human race) as I describe in the article.

North European projection of power (European and Jewish, Theodr Herzl and the road to Balfour Declaration, 1917) must soften for permanent peace in Israel.

The Christians suffer from the theologically backward looking Jesus syndrome: crucifixion as proof of passionate commitment to a cause (see comment above for The Revelation to John and the Second Coming).

At issue before crucifixion was: let us let in the Rabbi from Galili (Nazareth) into the temple elite if he relents on his claim to be the son of god.They did not mind his claim as the descendant of David and Solomon or his aspiration to be the King of the Jews because they had kings before without whom there would be no temple (Jesus of Nazareth; Nostra Aetate, Vatican POPE PAUL VI ON OCTOBER 28, 1965, Sister Rose’s Passion). He refused. He claimed to be the deliverer sent by his Father threatening the faith whose practice was autonomous in Judea but under Roman control. He was crucified. Most likely he was born to Mary of parthenogenesis and was not immortal

The Jews proved their point that he was human and not divine.

Ecce Homo, http://ctamirisa.com/2010/12/26/ecce-homo-a-critique-of-jesus/

Love thy neighbor as thyself (Leviticus, a book of Moses. An acquaintance of mine told me once that this wisdom is attributed to Hillel, I think it is Socratic, it could even be Egyptian from many centuries earlier and appears again in the Christian gospels much later).


http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Golden_Rule

Love of thy neighbor, of all human beings, needs resources. Love alone will not solve the problem. Action does. Or hate will become pervasive. Jesus was a preacher and did his job. He acted. However, is volunteering to be crucified action out of love or is it masochistic moral suasion? He did not have to die had he loved himself.


The Sermon on the Mount is an extraordinary critique of Judaism. Had he relented he would have been admitted into the temple priesthood, reformed Judaism to accept the Roman Gentiles (foreskinned males, perhaps circumcising a male sheep instead of infants) and made peace with Europe. The Romans liked him. They co-existed with the Jews but did not like the elitism of the ancient faith. It was in mutual interest to reform Jewish attitudes to Rome.



With due respect to all the adherents of the faith, he was a schnuck (naive) to die as he did. His Father in Heaven is going to teach him something about the real world and send him back to fix it, this time in control of his own life.

Most importantly, is the history of Christianity action as love? Does Christian love kill non-Christians and each other? If it does Jesus is not Christian. Or Christians are not Christians and Jesus is the only Christian. “There was only one Christian. He died on the cross.”

Christian conservatism can only be proven in complete nuclear disarmament. Can America do it?

http://www.anti-semitism.net/tag/chandra-tamirisa

The Jewish exile, as I stated above, must end in earth (pagan) – the eden – and in one world (one God, many individual paths), not in overwriting all of civilization with Jewish cosmology. Creation and evolution are not mutually inconsistent. And dominion is not domination. Not man and nature, but man is nature.

I can give you one God, but not the Aryan enlightenment – nobility of birth to nobility of the mind, no matter what your birth.

Work for a sustainable Israel at peace with its neighbors. I will work with you.

I am working on a getting a book advance from a publisher for The State. It would cross several sub-disciplines: Political theory, Alternative Constitutionalism, Comparative Politics, Economic Science, and Future Studies.

Plato’s ideal state is rule by the best. Its (mis)interpretation is akin to (mis) understanding Nietzsche’s übermensch.

I did not think Plato was adequate in classifying the people’s roles in relation to the structure of the state as guardians or philosophers, rulers, soldiers and all else.

In America, philosophers have little value outside the prep school and Ivy League hallways where they are not truly philosophers but teachers of the craft of geopolitics focused on the oath of allegiance to advancing the interest of the nation-state within its boundaries, soldiers are the best trained anywhere in the world in the military academies, and there are all else. So, you get my paragraph on Plato in relation to the American political structure. But, as I say, it is not the ideal state of Plato by any means nor is it the ideal state. I suggest an alternative model.

(In response to T A Balasubramanian and Vladimir Seroff on Linkedin) Plato’s rulers in Republic are the elites in mind. The ideal state, given the Socratic critique of Athenian democracy (Apology; I F Stone: The Trial of Socrates), is Plato’s rule by the best or aristocrats (him, self-referential, the upper class Athenian in mind and body turned philosopher. Plato, thus, becomes the guardian of his ideal state, Athens, through his Academy. Socrates was a vagabond. Could this be Hitler’s Aryan man misunderstood also as Nietzsche’s übermensch? Not if the rest of my state structure is adopted).

United States, France, Germany and Russia come closest to my ideal state (last two paragraphs). If they abrogate their legislatures, unlike the Roman Senate, and turn over participation in legislation and decision making directly to the people and abolish political parties, they will become the ideal states.

The Supreme Court of the United States, for example, then becomes a technocratic legal group of experts advising the president on cases that rise to him through the judiciary, likewise structured in the states of the federated union. Article I of the US Constitution will then directly reference people participation, not representatives and specifies that process of engagement. Article III specifies the Supreme Court as a legal advisory panel. Article II is amended accordingly to specify the new executive powers. The Amendments are preserved and streamlined to be similarly modified.

The bottom line: We the people are their own representatives in a unitary federalist structure of governance. Money then flows to the people not to the Congress and president. The change will be from a do nothing Congress to do something people.

This is an excellent article. I like your analysis and the depth. However I am not entirely sure if the world is as forward as a few of us.

with kind regards

Ramakrishna

On Amazon.com I have my publication “One” at http://www.amazon.com/gp/aw/d/B00539U4D6/ref=mp_s_a_1?qid=1324605259&sr=8-1.

My sense is that significant amount of time has passed in the Indian subcontinent between 60,000 years ago (ancestors of Australian aborigines) and 30,000 years ago (L haplogroup) when two migrations occurred to the area.

Subsequent remigrations may have homogenized the Y chromosome to more than 80 per cent L Haplogroup with some diversity among the rest in all of South Asia and in Arabia.

Krishna is said to have kept horses and elephants in Dwaraka (Gulf of Cambay) on the border between south and north off the coast of the Indian state of Gujarat.

At issue is when did he live? I hypothesize that period to be well before 10,000 years ago when northern India was still deglaciating after the ice age and the rivers were all southern for at least about 20,000 years if not longer. Not after the European Aryan invasion (existing theory).

The path of Aryanization was from India out to Eurasia. Not the other way around.

“Knowing whether signals associated with the initial peopling of Eurasia fall within our detection limits requires additional extensive simulations, but our current results indicate that the often debated episode of South Asian prehistory, the putative Indo-Aryan migration 3,500 years ago (see e.g., Abdulla) falls well within the limits of our haplotype-based approach. We found no regional diversity differences associated with k5 at K = 8. Thus, regardless of where this component was from (the Caucasus, Near East, Indus Valley, or Central Asia), its spread to other regions must have occurred well before our detection limits at 12,500 years. Accordingly, the introduction of k5 to South Asia cannot be explained by recent gene flow, such as the hypothetical Indo-Aryan migration. ”

http://www.cell.com/AJHG/fulltext/S0002-9297%2811%2900488-5?large_figure=true

“Evolutionary history shows that human populations likely originated in Africa, and the Genographic Project, the most extensive survey of human population genetic data to date, suggests where they went next…Modern humans migrated out of Africa via a southern route through Arabia, rather than a northern route by way of Egypt,” said a news statement released by IBM.”

“The divergence of a common genetic history between populations showed that Eurasian groups were more similar to populations from southern India, than they were to those in Africa. This supports a southern route of migration from Africa via the Bab-el-Mandeb Strait in Arabia before any movement heading north, and suggests a special role for south Asia in the ‘out of Africa’ expansion of modern humans.”

http://www.rdmag.com/News/2011/11/Life-Science-Genetics-Genomics-Genographic-Project-confirms-humans-migrated-from-Africa-through-Arabia/

http://newswatch.nationalgeographic.com/2011/11/03/modern-humans-wandered-out-of-africa-via-arabia/

Excellent blog here! Also your web site loads up fast! What web host are you using? Can I get your affiliate link to your host? I wish my website loaded up as quickly as yours lol…

Nice blog here! Also your web site loads up very fast! What host are you using? Can I get your affiliate link to your host? I wish my website loaded up as quickly as yours lol…

For example, what must the Greek people do to Bernanke for attending Bilderberg just before the Greek crisis? What was the Fed’s role together with Goldman Sachs?

Bilderberg is converging Europe and America on economic structure first and then political and social structure. Obama is moving the country left and Europe is moving right to meet in Switzerland. Why cannot Europe stay on target to 2050 and America be America? This is why Obama is a spy of Bilderberg to change America to keep the two continents in sync by 2050. And Americans have to sacrifice through 2022 at great risk to the country to fulfill the Bilderberg agenda.

The president must be impeached for posing a risk to US sovereignty under the Espionage Act by spying on the American people and manipulating economic policy together with Ben Bernanke at the Federal Reserve on behalf of foreign agents such as Bilderberg to return the favor for his Nobel and presidency.

Secret meetings with security guards and submachine guns is problematic.

http://ctamirisa.com/2011/06/20/the-bilderberg-gate/

http://www.amazon.com/gp/aw/d/1466211377/ref=mp_s_a_1?qid=1320675508&sr=8-1

Lesson for the G19 in Cannes: “If Obama or Clinton raise your expectations hold them to it. Schnucks. You are dealing with a country made not by innovation but by traveling salesmen who always knew how to leverage others’ innovation.”

America makes promises it delivers either through subterfuge or power, especially when held accountable. The only American innovation is its founding, besides the telephone, the airplane and the internet. All else came from elsewhere, including the industrial revolution.

In a political-economic system where material success is predicated on utilizing others’ human capital, social attitudes determine success. Racism prevails whatever your merits in leadership. So, America the schnuck, must be careful with Indo-Aryans in its own backyard, especially the Brahmins.

Four Forces and the Fifth Horseman. http://ctamirisa.wordpress.com/2011/02/13/the-four-forces-and-the-fifth-horseman/

There is not any magic about this and there is no need to vilify the Americana as the sole cause of poverty in the world. Much of the problem is a matter of perception or the lack of visibility into the economies of closed states like China. The India’s and Brazils of the world are open for all to see and what we see is pure greed on a scale that is numbing. What often passes for national pride is propaganda that tries to shift the blame for disparities in wealth across international borders so as to make a case for displaced hate.

For example, the Iranians hold a holiday demonstration to commemorate the U.S. hostage taking and reaffirm the official anti-US stance. However, the Green Revolution (that really launched the 2011 Arab Spring Revolutions in multiple nations), was rightly in opposition to their theocracy ruling the nation and stifling the ambitions of the Iranian people. The economic impact of the Iranian opposition to Western influences is negligible without the consistent opposition to the existence of the State of Israel. Most other nations would hardly care one way or the other, but this refusal to work out some form of compromise is a dual sin on both sides of the argument.

Nothing in Judaism or Islam warrants the continued animosity and the Christian influence is more absolution than it is true brokering of peace. It simple allows for divisions in those nations that otherwise would not even give the idea any consideration.

What many Middle Eastern nations seem to forget is that their global impact on trade is closely related to a resource of relatively limited quantities. Nations such as the United States and Russia, which have their own reserves, need not fear one-product economies and theocratic dictatorships because those are self-limiting systems that will always need to monitor their internal dissent to remain in power.

The pain of economic collapse may not be avoidable in a purely capitalist economic system, but the expectation of rebound offers a hope that few other systems now in practice can match. Monarchs and dictatorships tend to stagnate in a similar but more violent manner. The Iranian response to the Shah will eventually be repeated as a conditioned response to the Mullahs in charge. If these holy men are as wise as they suppose, they should account for the transition in some manner that supports their religious tenets to retain the control of the judiciary while abdicating that of the executive and the legislative. The merchants and the businesspersons of the nation will be thankful.

It is easy to look back and draw a conclusion from history that fits a perception of what we want the future to look like. Americans want a peaceful future, but we have allowed out politics to be too influenced by the ambitions of multinational corporations. Some understand and fear the isolationist and paranoia that accompanies such nationalistic notions. The United States cannot just try to turn back the clock. The realities of global changes in climate and economics will keep us on point for far longer than most give us current credit.

China is not only reluctant to take a role in leadership, she is unable to provide an example that anyone wants to emmulate. The American example may no longer be near ideal, but the alternatives are closer to Western ideals than those of the Communist genera.

Men, having determined that immortality is a perception, determine that they shall perpetuate thier will through the rememberance of their existance and thus give corporations bearing their names imortality.

- ML Hayes 2011

http://www.golemxiv.co.uk/2011/10/the-places-and-people-who-help-barclays-minimize-its-taxes/#comment-6520

WHo is Romney? ( I’ll google)